the page taken as our search engine crawled the Web.
The web site itself may have changed. You can check the current page or check for previous versions at the Internet Archive. Yahoo! is not affiliated with the authors of this page or responsible for its content.
Document
68834
Federal Register / Vol. 67, No. 219 / Wednesday, November 13, 2002 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A533808]
Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India:
Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY
:
Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
ACTION
:
Notice of Extension of Time
Limit of the Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review.
SUMMARY
:
The Department of Commerce
(the Department) is extending the
time limits of the preliminary results of
the antidumping duty administrative
review of stainless steel wire rod
(SSWR) from India. This review
covers the period December 1, 2000
through November 30, 2001.
EFFECTIVE DATE
:
November 13, 2002.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
:

Stephen Bailey, AD/CVD Enforcement
Group III, Office 9, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20230;
telephone: (202) 4821102.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
:
Applicable Statute and Regulations
Unless otherwise indicated, all
citations to the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (Act), are references to the
provisions effective January 1, 1995, the
effective date of the amendments made
to the Act by the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act. In addition, unless
otherwise indicated, all citations to the
Departments regulations are to the
regulations codified at 19 C.F.R. Part
351 (2001).
Background
On January 29, 2002, we published a
notice of initiation of a review of SSWR
from India covering the period
December 1, 2000 through November
30, 2001. See Initiation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Administrative
Reviews, January 22, 2002 (67 FR 4236).
On July 9, 2002, we published a notice
of extension of the preliminary results
of administrative review from
September 2, 2002, to November 1,
2002. See Stainless Steel Wire Rod from
India: Extension of Time Limit of
Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, July 9,
2002 (67 FR 45481) (Preliminary
Extension Notice). Additionally, on
September 17, 2002, we published a
notice of extension of the preliminary
results of administrative review from
November 1, 2002, to December 1, 2002.
See Stainless Steel Wire Rod from India:
Extension of Time Limit of Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review, September 17,
2002 (67 FR 58585).
Extension Of Time Limit Of Preliminary
Results
Section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act states
that if it is not practicable to complete
the review within the time specified, the
administering authority may extend the
245day period to issue its preliminary
results by 120 days. Because the
Department has already extended these
preliminary results only 90 days, we are
allowed to further extend the
preliminary results an additional 30
days. Completion of the preliminary
results of this review within the 305
day period is not practicable for the
following reasons, which were also
cited in the Preliminary Extension
Notice:

The review involves four
companies, a large number of
transactions and complex adjustments.

All companies include sales and
cost investigations which require the
Department to gather and analyze a
significant amount of information
pertaining to each companys sales
practices, manufacturing costs and
corporate relationships.

Additionally, responses from three
of the four companies required the
Department to issue multiple
supplemental questionnaires which
further delayed the planned verification
schedules.

The planned verification for one of
the companies was delayed due to the
Department having to issue additional
supplemental questionnaires.
Therefore, in accordance with section
751(a)(3)(A) of the Act, we are extending
the time period for issuing the
preliminary results of review by 30 days
until December 31, 2002. The final
results continue to be due 120 days after
the publication of the preliminary
results.
Dated: November 11, 2002.
Joseph A. Spetrini,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import
Administration, Group III.
[FR Doc. 0228818 Filed 111202; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510DSS
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
University of Vermont; Notice of
Decision on Application for Duty-Free
Entry of Scientific Instrument
This decision is made pursuant to
section 6(c) of the Educational,
Scientific, and Cultural Materials
Importation Act of 1966 (Pub. L. 89
651, 80 Stat. 897; 15 CFR part 301).
Related records can be viewed between
8:30 AM and 5 PM in Suite 4100W, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Franklin
Court Building, 1099 14th Street, NW,
Washington, DC.
Docket Number: 02033. Applicant:
University of Vermont, Burlington, VT
05405. Instrument: High Speed CCD
Camera, Model CPL MS1000.
Manufacturer: Canadian Photonic Labs,
Canada. Intended Use: See notice at 67
FR 52944, August 14, 2002.
Comments: None received. Decision:
Application denied. Instruments or
apparatus of equivalent scientific value
to the foreign instrument, for such
purposes as this instrument is intended
to be used, are being manufactured in
the United States. Reasons: Pursuant to
15 CFR 301.5(d)(1)(iii) duty-free entry is
predicated upon a finding by the
Director with respect to * * * whether
an instrument or apparatus of
equivalent scientific value to such
article, for the purposes for which the
article is intended to be used, is being
manufactured in the United States.
Furthermore, 15 CFR 301.5(d)(1)(i)
stipulates that The determination of
scientific equivalency shall be based on
a comparison of the pertinent
specifications of the foreign instrument
with similar pertinent specifications of
comparable domestic instruments. As
defined by 15 CFR 301.2(s):
Pertinent specifications are those
specifications necessary for the
accomplishment of the specific
scientific research or science-related
educational purposes described by the
applicant. Specifications of features
(even if guaranteed) which afford greater
convenience, satisfy personal
preferences, accommodate institutional
commitments or limitations, or assure
lower costs of acquisition, installation,
operation, servicing or maintenance are
not pertinent.
The applicant states that it conducted
a thorough search for potential vendors
of high-speed CCD imaging systems and
contacted relevant manufacturers. The
applicant claims that It was during this
phase that it was realized that many of
the products on the marketdomestic
or otherwisewere (1) unnecessarily
VerDate 0ct<31>2002
15:21 Nov 12, 2002
Jkt 200001
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13NON1.SGM
13NON1