AR used in the test was a pre-ban
Olympic Arms CAR-15 with an 11.5-
inch barrel and permanently attached 4.5-
inch flash hider to make it comply with
the Federal law requiring a 16-inch bar-
rel. This rifle is basically stock with three
exceptions. The bolt has been treated
with Robars NP-3. The rifle also has new
green stocks from Rock River Arms and
an Ashley tritium dot front sight.
Before going on to the field tests, lets
look at some pros and cons of both rifles.
In terms of initial cost, the nod must
go to the Mini-14. My favorite local gun
shop lists the Mini-14 (as tested) at $469.
Their least expensive AR-15 is a post-ban
gun carrying a price tag of $795. A used
pre-ban AR in like-new condition is list-
ed for $1,395almost three times the
cost of a new Mini-14.
When it comes to spare parts and
repair, the scales tip in favor of the AR
guns with numerous manufacturers mak-
ing parts for them, not to mention surplus
GI parts.
I, for one, dont consider magazines
for semiautomatic arms to be "acces-
sories." Without magazines the weapons
become awkward single-shots. Here
again, the AR-type rifles have a huge
advantage over the Mini-14 as reliable 20
and 30-round mags are readily available
at a reasonable price. I have seen non-
restricted factory high-capacity Mini-14
magazines listed for as high as $120 each.
A person who would buy three or four
factory magazines would quickly see a
diminishing return on the initial price of
the rifle itself. With this in mind I
obtained several "cheap" high-capacity
magazines for the Mini-14 to see how
they would work for the average guy on
the street. More on this later.
For shooting up close in a CQB-type
environment, it is my opinion that the
Mini-14 is better than the AR. This is due
to the high sight/low bore line on the AR,
which forces a shooter to aim high at close
range. In the event a head shot is called
for, a shooter must actually put the front
sight at the very top of the head (or even
slightly above) instead of holding dead on
the target. For all intent and purposes, this
is not a factor with the Mini-14 as its
sights are mounted closer to the barrel.
S . W. A . T .
M A R C H 2 0 0 2
42
The author practices getting quick hits on the target starting from the ready position.
RUGER MINI-14 VS. THE AR-15
And the Winner Is...
By Denny Hansen
T Safeties are a toss up and depend
completely on the individual. Personally,
I like the way my thumb rides on the AR
safety and allows me to keep my trigger
finger straight along the trigger guard. I
am acquainted with several individuals
whom I consider experts, however, who
swear by the Garand/M14-type inside-
the-trigger-guard safety on the Mini.
Ergonomically speaking, both are superb.
Only a fool goes into battle without
making sure his firearm is charged and
ready and I frequently press check any
firearm I am carrying. From a tactical
perspective, I like the Mini better than the
AR when it comes to press checks. The
Mini can be press checkedboth visual-
ly and tactilelywhile retaining a firing
grip on the stock. Quietly pushing for-
ward on the charging handle will ensure
the round is fully chambered.
The AR, on the other hand, can be eas-
ily checked visually during daylight
while retaining a firing grip but is impos-
sible to check by touch without much
more manipulation. Also, due to the fash-
ion in which an AR locks up, it may or
may not easily go back into battery when
the charging handle is released. This
necessitates one to either use the forward
assist or withdraw the bolt almost to the
point of extraction and letting it slam for-
wardnot a good idea if noise discipline
is important.
In regards to changing magazines, a
speed (combat) reload can be accom-
plished faster with the AR by all but the
most skilled tacticians. In my hands a tac-
tical reload is slightly faster with the AR,
but the difference is so small as to negate
any real advantage with either rifle. And
as it pertains to self-defense, if you have
a 20-round magazine in place how many
times do you intend to miss?
OK, so much for the pros and cons.
On to the test.
The ammunition in the test consisted
of Black Hills 55-grain FMJ and reloads
using homemade jacketed 55-grain bul-
lets. For those who have not tried Black
Hills ammo, you need to have your local
dealer get some for you. Regardless of
caliber, this is some of the finest, most
consistent ammo I have ever fired.
The home-brewed bullets use fired
.22 Long Rifle cases swaged with lead
cores on Corbin swaging equipmenta
very economical way to burn a lot of
.223 fodder.
I used GI 20 and 30-round magazines
in the AR and a combination of factory,
Ram-Line and USA 20 and 30-rounders
in the Mini-14.
Since the AR has had thousands of
rounds fired through it, the Mini-14 was
given a 200 round break-in period to
make the test fair. No malfunctions were
experienced during the break-in.
The official test crew (my son Flint)
and I fired both rifles at distances of 3,
15, 25, 50 and 100 yards. As expected,
the Mini-14 was a little faster on simulat-
ed hostage targets up close as we did not
need to slow down for the above-men-
tioned high sight/low bore line that the
AR has. Groups averaging around an inch
or so were common out to 25 yards. At 50
yards off hand, groups from the Mini-14
averaged just under 3 inches, with the AR
doing slightly better with 2.4-inch
groups.
With both of us firing from prone at
100 yards, Flint was able to keep the
Mini-14s groups at around 6 inches,
while I was only able to manage 8-inch
groups. Changing to the AR, I was able to
The Minis bolt hold-open device is a button located on the top
left of the receiver.
Test guns were Rugers new synthetic stocked, stainless steel Mini-14 and a pre-ban
Olympic Arms CAR-15 with new green stocks from Rock River Arms.
WWW.SWATMAGAZINE.COM
RUGER MINI-14 VS. THE AR-15
M A R C H 2 0 0 2
S . W. A . T . 43
The ARs bolt hold-open is located on the left side of the frame
and also serves as a bolt release. RUGER MINI-14 VS. THE AR-15
S . W. A . T .
M A R C H 2 0 0 2
44
keep a 5-round string barely under six
inches, while Flint inexplicably shot a
larger group of 7 inches with the AR. This
reversal of who shot better with what gun
may be explained by the fact that Flint
cant quite seem to get used the Ashley
dot front sight, and I kept losing the
Minis stainless steel front sight against
the light-colored target at that range.
During the test we burned a total of
almost 1,500 rounds of ammunition, split
evenly between the two rifles. Most of
the shooting was done at less than 50
yards to simulate more realistic "real
world" firing conditions. At times we shot
so much, so fast that the barrels became
too hot to touch.
To check the worst-case scenario, at
one point we dropped about half a hand-
ful of loose dirt into the magazine well
of each rifle and then shook each of
them to distribute the dirt. After running
a cleaning patch down the bore of each
rifle to make sure the barrel was clean
(no sense in being completely stupid and
having a rifle blow up in your face) we
attempted to fire a 20-round magazine
rapidly through each. The Mini-14 ran
without a malfunction. Much to my sur-
prise, my usually malfunction-free AR
burped on the third round, and did not go
fully into battery.
During the test the only problem that
I had with the Mini-14 was from one of
the USA 30-round magazines. This mag-
azine would feed one round, and fail to
feed the second. This was repeated 15
times until the magazine was empty. I
"fixed" the questionable mag by placing
it on a flat rock and stomping it flat. No
more problems were experienced with it.
I highly suggest doing this with any
magazine that is not 100 percent reli-
able. The odds of it somehow getting
mixed up with your good magazines is
not a coincidence you want to chance
with a defensive arm.
The Ruger factory, Ramline, and one
of the USA magazines worked beautiful-
ly in the Mini-14. Incidentally, Ramline
magazines work in both Mini-14s and
AR-type guns with no modifications nec-
essarya bonus for those who own both
type of rifles.
Overall, there is no clear "winner" in the
Mini-14 versus AR-15 debate. Both have
features I like and dislike. As far as person-
The magazine release for the Mini-14 is the lever-type, located
behind the magazine.
The Mini-14 safety is similar to the Garand, i.e. inside the trigger
guard.
The ARs magazine release is a button located on the right side
of the receiver. For speed loads, the author feels this is a better
system.
The ARs safety is a selector switch located on the left side of the
frame and easily manipulated by a right-handed shooters
thumb. The author personally prefers this system. WWW.SWATMAGAZINE.COM
RUGER MINI-14 VS. THE AR-15
M A R C H 2 0 0 2
S . W. A . T . 45
CIRCLE #116 ON READER SERVICE CARD
al preference, I would take the AR, but
then again I have a lot more trigger
time behind that system and therefore
more comfortable with it. A good
friend of mine, who is a nationally
known firearms instructor, told me he
would take the Mini-14 over the AR
any day of the week even if the Mini-
14 was priced as high as the AR-15.
If you prefer the AR-15, fine. On
the other hand, if you like the Mini-14
better, you need not apologize to any-
one. Both are fine, reliable rifles.
D
SOURCES:
Sturm, Ruger & Company
200 Ruger Road
Prescott, AZ 86301
(520) 778-6