r>
Project Unity
1
Project Unity

Chapter 15
A Transparent View

Consider a couple of bar magnets or a compass, where two opposite poles
attract and two like poles repel and ask yourself why this is possible?

You might suggest it is simply the magnetic force at work as we exist within
the magnetic field of the earth. But there is no magnetic force as the magnetic
effects of attraction and repulsion are merely responses resulting from the
dynamic effects of the underlying dynamic force of universe, which is non-
linear time field frequency acceleration.

The magnetic field of the earth is divided at the equator as your compass needle
points one way in the northern hemisphere and the other way in the southern
hemisphere due to your proximity to either the south pole or the north pole.

It is interesting that the polar region we refer to as the North Pole is actually the
south magnetic pole and the South Pole is actually the north magnetic pole.
And thanks to modern science we now know that the northern hemisphere is
actually the southern hemisphere and the southern hemisphere is actually the
northern hemisphere, whereby the North Pole is in Antarctica.

However, regardless of which way up the earth may be positioned the north
pole of your compass will always point to the South Pole, which we are used to
calling the North Pole. But the fact remains that a north and South Pole attract
while two south poles or two north poles repel.

The magnetic field extending across the external surface curve of the earth
corresponds to two of the four dimensional directions of non-linear time field
frequency acceleration, which run north and south from the equator as non-
linear time field frequency acceleration accelerates from the equator to the
north pole and from the equator to the south pole. And, in that the internal
dynamics of the earth and the external dynamics of the earth affect inverse
responses corresponding to the conditional effects of the underlying force of
non-linear time field frequency acceleration, it should not be too surprising to
discover that the northern and southern dynamics also affect inverse responses.

2
The structural dynamics of the earth are determined by the underlying force of
non-linear time field frequency acceleration which is continuously accelerating
in four dimensional directions, which are in the direction of rotational spin,
from the equator to the North Pole, from the equator to the South Pole and
symmetrically to the center of the earth.

Therefore both gravity and electromagnetism are effects of the underlying force
determining the form and function of our earth whereby in relation to the
internal dynamics, an increase in non-linear time field frequency acceleration
reduces the gravitational potential and the electromagnetic potential of our
earth.

In relation to the field structure of our earth there is more resistance to a further
increase in non-linear time field frequency acceleration existing along the
equator than exists anywhere else on or within the earth, in relation to the
external condition and the internal condition of the earths physical form.
Therefore there is less energy existing along the equator than anywhere else on
or within the earth, which means there is more energy at both the north and
south poles in relation to the earths external surface curve.

As gravity diminishes symmetrically from the surface curve of the earth to the
center of the earths core and isometrically from the surface curve of the earth
to the infinite depths of space the earths electromagnetic potential increases
inversely to the decrease in the gravitational potential.

So it would make sense that the magnetic effect extending across the earths
external surface curve from the equator to the north and south poles can equally
be viewed as an effect or response corresponding to the dimensional directions
of non-linear time field frequency acceleration.

In this respect, it is possible to view the attraction of two opposite poles as a
response to non-linear time field frequency acceleration, in that the attraction
existing between two opposite poles must be affected by a decreased energy
differential affecting the space and motion between them.

On the other hand, the repulsion of two like poles, either two north poles or two
south poles, can be viewed as a response to non-linear time field
frequency
acceleration in that the repulsion between two like poles is affected by an
increased energy differential affecting the space and motion existing between
them.

3
Therefore two like poles must correspond to a decreasing potential of resistance
to a further increase in non-linear time field frequency acceleration which
forces them to repel, in that, the underlying force of non-linear time field
frequency acceleration affects the space and motion remaining relative to the
system of reference.

Consequently the two like poles are affecting an increase in the space between
them, which forces them apart.

On the other hand, two opposite poles must correspond to an increasing
potential of resistance to a further increase in non-linear time field frequency
acceleration which forces them to attract, in that the underlying force of non-
linear time field frequency acceleration affects the space and motion remaining
relative to the system of reference.

Consequently, the two opposite poles are affected by a decrease in the space
existing between them which forces them closer together.

It is important to understand that in terms of the repulsion being affected
between two like poles and the attraction being affected between to opposite
poles, there is no pulling or pushing force involved. The action is merely a
dynamic response to the condition of field.

Now we come to an interesting point as it is impossible to separate
electromagnetism into electricity and magnetism, you cannot have one without
the other. Yet there are those who believe you can, which may be the same
people who claim there are monopolar particles.

There are no monopolar particles as a monopolar particle would be only half a
field and subject to structural failure. And we know that protons, neutrons and
electrons are structurally stable.

It has been proven by experiment that free protons always repel each other, but
when they are within the atomic nucleus they stick to each other like
glue,
atomic glue at that. They call the force that holds the nucleus together the
nuclear force, but there is no nuclear force, there is only non-linear time field
frequency acceleration.

So why do free protons always repel each other?

The repulsion of free protons is not determined by magnetic polarity, but
determined by the underlying force of non-linear time field frequency
4
acceleration affecting an inversely proportional external response to the internal
condition of the proton.

In this respect, the continuous acceleration of non-linear time field frequency
acceleration affecting the dynamic structure of the proton causes there to be a
disproportional potential of resistance on the outside, relative to the internal
inside of the proton, which effectively holds each free proton apart from other
free protons.

This is similar to the planets and moons existing beyond the surface of the sun,
in that, if two planetary bodies come within close proximity of each other they
will be repelled or deflected away from each other. And because a free proton
has such a high ratio of energy per unit of mass, the proportional response of
repulsion is amplified accordingly.

So it is a differential in the underlying force of non-linear time field frequency
acceleration, corresponding to the value of (c) remaining relative to each proton
which causes free protons to repel.

When a proton is within the nucleus, the response is reversed as the condition
affecting the proton within the nucleus is inversely proportional to the
condition affecting a proton outside of the nucleus - its actually that simple.

Within the nucleus, the protons are dynamically focused to the non-absolute
center of the atomic field whereby each proton is dynamically focused to the
center of field associated with the atoms structure which remains relative to the
field in which it exists. But equally, each proton within the nucleus is itself
affected by a substantial increase in non-linear time field frequency
acceleration affecting its field structure.

The protons closest to the center of the nucleus are to be proportionally more
dynamic than those further removed from the center of field.

Therefore, each proton existing within the nucleus is going to have more mass
than a free proton as the dynamic potential within the nucleus is increasing to
the center of field.

The reason why the proton is forcefully focused to the center of the nucleus is
that the value of non-linear time field frequency at the center of the atoms field
is equal to the non-absolute upper limit of (c) remaining relative to the system
of reference.

5
The rate of non-linear time field frequency acceleration continuously
accelerating, internally, to the center of the nucleus provides an internal
inversion of space and motion relative to the space and motion existing
externally.

When two or more free protons come within close prox