Towards a targeted surfactant stabilized ultrasound contrast agent
ized ultrasound contrast agent
61
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Babich J. and Fischman A., Target imaging of infection, Advance Drug Delivery
Reviews, 37, 1999, 237-252
2. Bartlett G., Phosphorous Assay in Column Chromatography, Journal of
Biological Chemistry, 234, 1959, 466-468
3. Basude, R., Duckworth J. and Wheatley M., Influence of Environmental
Conditions on a New Surfactant-Based Contrast Agent: ST68, Ultrasound in
Medicine and Biology, 26, 4, 621-628, 2000
4. Basude R., PhD Thesis, Characterization of a New Class of Surfactant Stabilized
Ultrasound Contrast Agents, and Investigation of Ultra-harmonics as a new
diagnostic tool, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 1999
5. Bergers G. and Hanahan D., Cell factories for fighting cancer, Nature
Biotechnology, 19, January 2001
6. Calliada F., Campani R., Bottinelli O., Bozzini M., and Sommaruga M.,
Ultrasound Contrast Agents Basic Principles, European Journal of Radiology, 27,
S157-S160, 1998
7. Cachard C., Boukkaz A. and Gimenez G., In Vitro Evaluation of Acoustic
Properties of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Experimental Set-up and Signal
Processing, Ultrasonics, 34, 1996, 595-598
8. Coulter Multisizer II Manual, Beckman Coulter Corporation, Miami, FL, 1991
9. de Jong N., Frinking P., Bouakaz A. and Ten Cate F., Detection Procedures of
Ultrasound Contrast Agents, Ultrasonics, 38, 2000, 87-92
10. de Jong N. and Ten Cate F., New ultrasound contrast agents and technological
innovations, Ultrasonics 34, 1996, 587-590
11. de Jong N., Frinking P., Ten Cate F. and van der Wouw P., Characteristics of
Contrast Agent and 2-D Imaging, 1996 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 1996,
1449-1458
62
12. Demos S., Dager S., Klegerman M., Nagaraj A., McPherson D. and Onyuksel H.,
In Vitro targeting of acoustically reflective immunoliposomes to fibrin under
various flow conditions, Journal of Drug Targeting, 5, 6, 1998, 507-518
13. Duck, Baker and Starritt, Ultrasound in Medicine, Institute of Physics Pub,
London, 1998
14. Forsberg F., Basude R., Lui J., Alessandro J., Shi W., Rawool N., Goldberg B.,
and Wheatley M., Effect of filling gases on the backscatter from contrast
microbubbles: Theory and in vivo measurements, Ultrasound in Medicine and
Biology, 8, 1999, 1203-1211
15. Forsberg F., Wu Y., Makin I., Wang W. and Wheatley M., Quantitative Acoustic
Characterization of a New Surfactant-Based Ultrasound Contrast Agent,
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 23, 8, 1997, 1201-1208
16. Frinking P.J., Bouakaz A., Kirkhorn J. and Ten Cate F.J., Ultrasound contrast
imaging: Current and new potential methods, Ultrasound in Medicine and
Biology, 26, 6, 2000, 965-975
17. Frohly J., Labouret C. and Bruneel C., Ultrasonic cavitation monitoring by
acoustic noise power measurement, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,
108, 5, 2000, 2012-2020
18. Gramiak R. and Shah M., Echocardiography of the Aortic Root, Investigative
Radiology, 3, 1968, 356-358
19. Goldberg B., Ultrasound Contrast Agents, Martin Dunitz Ltd, 1997
20. Hall C. S., Lanza G., Rose J., Kaufmann R., Fuhrhop R., Handley S., Waters K.,
Miller J., and Wickline S., Experimental Determination of Phase Velocity of
Perfluorocarbons: Applications to Targeted Contrast Agents, IEEE Transactions
on Ultrasounics, Ferrielectronics and Frequency Control, 47, 1, 2000, 75-83
21. Hussey M., Basic Physics and Technology of Medical Diagnostic Ultrasound,
Elsevier, 1984
22. Hoff L., Acoustic properties of ultrasonic contrast agents, Ultrasonics 34, 1996,
591-593
23.
http://www.BeckmanCoulter.com
/products/instrument/PartChar/pc_multisizer3.as
p, December 24, 2001
63
24. Kasprzak J. D. and Ten Cate F. J., New Ultrasound Contrast Agents for Left
Ventricular and Myocardial Opacification, Herz, 23, 8, 1998, 474-482
25. Klibnov A., Hughes M., Villanueva F., Jankowski R., Wagner W., Wojdyla J.,
Wible J. and Brandenburger G., Targeting and ultrasound imaging of
microbubble-based contrast agents, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics,
Biology and Medicine, 8, 1999, 177-184
26. Klibnov A., Targeted Delivery of Gas-Filled Microbubbles, Contrast Agents for
Ultrasound Imaging, Advanced Drug Delivery, 37, 1999, 139-157
27. Lanza G., Abendschein D., Hall C., Marsh J., Scott M., Scherrer D. and Wickline
S. Molecular Imaging of Strech-InducedTissue Factor Expression in Carotid
Arteries with Intravascular Ultrasound, Investigative Radiology, 35, 4, 2000
28. Lanza G.M., Lorenz C., Fisher S., Scott M., Cacheris W., Kaufmann, Gaffney P.
and Wickline S., Enhanced Detection of Thrombi with a Novel Fibrin-targeted
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Agent, Academic Radiology, Vol. 5, 1998, Suppl 1,
S173-S176
29. Lanza G.M., Targeted Acoustic Contrast Agents: New Opportunities for
Ultrasound in Medical Diagnosis and Therapy, Acoustical Society of America
ICA/ASA 98, Seattle, WA
30. Lanza G.M., Trousil R., Wallace K., Rose J., Hall C., Scott M., Miller J.,
Eisenburg P., Gaffney P. and Wickline S., In vitro characterization of a novel,
tissue-targeted ultrasonic contrast system with acoustic microscopy, Journal of the
Acoustic Society of America, 104, 1998, 3665-3672
31. Lanza G., Wallace K., Fischer S., Christy D., Scott M., Trousil R., Cacheris W.,
Miller J., Gaffney P. and Wickline S., High-Frequency Ultrasound Detection of
Thrombi with A Targeted Contrast System, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology,
23, 6, 1997, 863-870
32. Lanza G., Wallace K., Scott M., Cacheris W., Abendschein D., Christy D.,
Sharkey A., Miller J., Gaffney P. and Wickline S., A Novel Site-Targeted
Ultrasonic Agent with Broad Biomedical Application, Circulation, 94, 12, 1996,
3334-3340
33. Mendenhall W. et al., Mathematical Statistics with Applications 4
th
Edition,
Duxbury Press, 1990, Belmont, CA
64
34. Minnaert M., On musical air bubbles and the sound of running water, Phil.
Magazine., 26, 121, 1936
35. Morgan C., Anderson S., Pye S., Sboros V. and McDicken W., Quantification of
microbubble destruction of three fluorocarbon-filled ultrasonic contrast agents,
Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 26, 4, 2000, 629-639
36. Pasqualini R., Koivunen E. and Ruoslahti E.,
v Integrins as receptors for tumor
targeting by circulating ligands, Nature Biotechnology, 15, 1997, 5452-546
37. Phillips D., Chen X, Baggs R., Rubens D., Violante M. and Parker K., Acoustic
backscatter properties of the particle/bubber ultrasound contrast agent,
Ultrasonics, 36, 8, 1998, 883-892
38. Randall R. H., An introduction to acoustics, Addison-Wesley Publishing
Company, Inc., 1951
39. Repacholi M. H., Garandolfo M., and Rindi A., Ultrasound: Medical
Applications, Biological Effects and Hazard Potential, Plenum Press, New York,
1987
40. Rose J.L. and Goldberg B.B., Basic Physics in Diagnostic Ultrasound, Wiley
Medical Publication, 1979
41. Shen L., M.S. Thesis, Investigation of Process Modification for Development of
Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Agent, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 1999
42. Shi W. T., and Forsberg F., Ultrasound Characterization of The Nonlinear
Properties of Contrast Microbubbles, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 26, 1,
2000, 93-104
43. Shi W., Frosberg F., Tornes A. Ostensen J. and Goldberg B., Destruction of
Contrast Microbubbles and the Association with Inertial Cavitation, Ultrasound in
Medicine and Biology, 26, 6, 2000, 1009-1019
44. Shung, K. K., Principle of Medical Imaging, Academic Press, San Diego, 1992
45. Tachibana K. and Tachibana S., Albumin microbubble echo-contrast material as
an enhancer for ultrasound accelerated thrombolysis, Circulation 92, 5, 1995,
1148-1150,
65
46. Takeuchi M., McCreary T.P., Avelar E., Sheahan M., Connolly R., Santanen A.,
Unger E. and Pandian N., Enhanced Visualization of Intravascular Thrombus with
the use of a Thrombus Targeting Ultrasound Contrast Agent (MRX408):
Evidence from Experimental Echocardiographic Studies, Journal of the American
College of Cardiology, 31, 2, S1, 1998,
47. Takeuchi M., McCreary T.P., Ogunyankin K., Vannan M., Sheahan M., Connolly
R., Santanen A., Unger E. and Pandian N., A New Tissue Targeted Ultrasound
Contrast Agent, MRX408, Improves Visualization and Delineation of left Artial
Appendage Clot with Conventional 2-dimensional Echocardiography, JACC,
1998
48. Ungaer E. C., McCreery T.P., Sweitzer R.H., Shen D. and Wu G., In vitro studies
of a new thrombus-specific ultrasound contrast agent, American Journal
Cardiology, June 18, 81, 1998, 12A, 58G-61G
49. Ungaer E. C., SonoPoration
TM
and Gene Delivery with Acoustically Active
Carriers, European Journal of Ultrasound, 6, S2, 1997, 87195-87199
50. Wadih A., Pasqualini R. and Ruoslaht E., Cancer Treatment by Targeted Drug
Delivery to Tumor Vasculature in a Mouse Model, Science, 279, 1998, 377-380
51. Wang W., Morse C. and Wheatley M., Langmuir Trough Study of Surfactant
Mixtures Used in the Production of a New Ultrasound Contrast Agent Consisting
of Stabilized Microbubbles, Journal of Physical Chemistry, 100, 1996, 13815-
13821
52. Ward M., Wu J. and Chiu J., Experimental Study of the Effects of Optison
Concentration on Sonoporation in vitro, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 26,
7, 2000, 1169-1175
53. Wickline S., Shephard R. and Daugherty A., Quantitative Ul