Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second ...

pe="text/css">
Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Figure 3.1 The bonding wire connection to a pad.
Bonding wire
Pad
(the smashed wire)
(the bright square)
100 祄 (final size)
100 祄 (final)
FOX
Insulator
Insulator
Top of the wafer
or die
Metal2
Layout or top view
Cross-sectional view
Insulator
p-substrate
Layout of metal2 used for bonding pad with associated cross-sectional view.
Figure 3.2 Table 3.1 Typical parasitic capacitances in a CMOS process. Note that while the
physical distance between the layers decreases, as process technology scales
downwards, the dielectric constant used in between the layers can be decreased to
keep the parasitic capacitances from becoming too significant. The values are
representative of the parasitics in both long- and short-channel CMOS processes.
Plate Cap. aF/

2
min typ max
Fringe Cap. aF/

min typ max
Poly1 to subs. (FOX)
53 58 63
85 88 92
Metal1 to poly1
35 38 43
84 88 93
Metal1 to substrate
21 23 26
75 79 82
Metal1 to diffusion
35 38 43
84 88 93
Metal2 to poly1
16 18 20
83 87 91
Metal2 to substrate
13 14 15
78 81 85
Metal2 to diffusion
16 18 20
83 87 91
Metal2 to metal1
31 35 38
95 100 104
Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Top of the wafer
or die
Insulator
Insulator
Overglass opening
Insulator
2,000 (drawn)
Layout of a metal2 pad with pad opening for bonding connection
Figure 3.3
in a 50 nm (scale factor) CMOS process.
Metal2
Overglass layer
Spacing between
OVGL layer and metal2
exactly 6 祄 or a drawn
2,000 (drawn)
distance of 120
Insulator
Insulator
Insulator
FOX
p-substrate
Figure 3.4 Layout and cross-sectional views.
Metal2
Via1
Via1
Metal1
Cross-section
Cross-section Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Metal1
Metal2
Cross-section
Figure 3.5 An example layout and cross-sectional view using including the n-well.
n-well
Insulator
Insulator
Insulator
FOX
p-substrate
n-well
Metal2
Metal1
Via1
Cross-section
p-substrate
4
20,000
Metal1 layout view for Ex. 3.3.
4
One square
Drawn layout
Figure 3.6 Layout and cross-sectional view with parasitics for the metal line
in Ex. 3.3.
1
2
3
4,999
5,000 Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
in
out
time
28 ps
Figure 3.7 Simulating the delay through a 1 mm wire made using metal1.
*** Figure 3.7 CMOS: Circuit Design,
Layout, and Simulation ***
.control
destroy all
run
plot vin vout
.endc
.tran 1p 250p
O1 Vin 0 Vout 0 TRC
Rload Vout 0 1G
Vin vin 0 DC 0 pulse 0 1 50p 0
.model TRC ltra R=0.1 C=32e-18 len=5k
.end
Layout view of 10 square
metal1 and metal2
Metal2 is the top
plate of the capacitor
and metal 1 is bottom.
Insulator
Insulator
Capacitance between metal1 and metal2.
Figure 3.8 Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
0
1
Equivalent circuit used to calculate the change in metal1 voltage, see Ex. 3.5.
Figure 3.9
C
12
C
1sub
V
metal1
V
metal2
Figure 3.10 Simulating the operation of the circuit in Fig. 3.9.
V
metal2
V
metal1
*** Figure 3.10 CMOS: Circuit Design,
Layout, and Simulation ***
.control
destroy all
run
plot vmetal2 vmetal1
.endc
.tran 10p 5n UIC
vmetal2 vmetal2 0 DC 0 pulse 0 1 2n 1n
C12 vmetal2 vmetal1 209e-18
C1sub vmetal1 0 164e-18
.end Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Metal1
Metal2
Metal2
Overlap of via1 with
metal1 and metal2
Minimum spacing 1.5
Minimum width 1.5
Via1 exact size 1.5 by 1.5
is a minimum of 0.5
Minimum width is 1.5
Min. space 2
Figure 3.11 Design rules for the metal layers using the CMOSEDU rules.
Metal1
(a) Layout using two boxes
(b) Layout using a single box
Figure 3.12 Equivalence of layouts drawn with a different number
of shapes. Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Figure 3.13 Via1 cell with a rank of 1.
Three boxes: a via1 box that is
1.5 by 1.5, a metal1 box 2.5 by
2.5, and a metal2 box directly
placed on the metal1 box that
is 2.5 by 2.5.
Insulator
Insulator
Cross-sectional
view of the via1
cell.
M1
M2
Figure 3.14 Layouts used in Ex. 3.8.
(a)
(b)
Minimum via spacing, 1.5
M1
M2 Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
M2
M1
10
M2
M1
10
(a)
The contact resistance
of the via in Fig. 3.14a.
(b) The contact resistance
of the four vias in Fig. 3.14b.
10
10
10
Figure 3.15 The schematics of the contact resistances for
the layouts in Fig. 3.14.
Conductors used to illustrate crosstalk.
Figure 3.16
Layout view
Angled view
p-sub
FOX
Insulator
Metal1
C
m Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Circuit
10 mm of metal1 150 nm wide
VDD
Ideally
Ideally ground (= 0 V)
I
I
VDD
10 mm of metal1 150 nm wide
Circuit
6.67k
6.67k
1V
50 礎
50 礎
667 mV (not 1 V)
333 mV (not 0 V)
(a)
(b)
Figure 3.17
Illustrating problems with incorrectly sized conductors.
Pad
Pad
VDD
VDD
ground
ground
Buffer
In
Out
30 pF
VDD
Figure 3.18 Estimating the decoupling capacitance needed in an output buffer.
Off-chip
On-chip
Decoupling C Table 3.2 Sizes for an example 1 mm square chip with a scale factor of 50 nm.
Final size
Scaled size
Pad size
100
祄 by 100 祄
2,000 by 2,000
Pad spacing
(center to center)
130

2,600
Number of pads on a
side (corners empty)
6
6
Total number of pads
24
24
Overglass opening
88
祄 by 88 祄
1,760 by 1,760
Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Figure 3.19 Layout of a Via1 cell.
2.5
1.5
2.5
Metal2
Via
Metal1
Layout view
Figure 3.20 Layout of the bonding pad.
2,000 (100 um)
2,000 (100 um)
Both metal1 and metal2
Outline
layer
300
15 um
Overglass Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Overglass layer
120 (6 um)
120
Figure 3.21 Corner detail for the pad in Fig. 3.20.
(6um)
Zoomed in corner showing vias
Figure 3.23 The layout of a padframe.
1,040 um or 20,800
CMOS circuitry goes in this area. Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Insulator
Insulator
Overglass opening
Insulator
Metal2
Metal1
Via1
Figure 3.22 Simplified cross-sectional view of the bonding pad discussed in
this section. Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Figure 3.24 Showing the layout of various patterns for measuring parasitics.
A
B
(a) A serpentine pattern
A
B
(b) Rectangular pattern
A
B
(c) Using two serpentine patterns to
measure mutual capacitance
x
y
A
B
(d) Measuring plate capacitance
C
m
Figure 3.25 SEM photo showing patterned metal layers. Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Metal1
Overglass layer
Figure 3.26 Layout used in Problem 3.4. Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Metal2
Via1
Via2
Metal1
Metal3
Figure 3.27 Layout for Problem 3.5.
Figure 3.28 Layout for Problem 3.8.
Metal2
Metal1
Metal1
Metal2
Metal1
N-well
A
B Figures from CMOS Circuit Design, Layout, and Simulation, Second Edition
By R. Jacob Baker, Copyright Wiley-IEEE
Figure 3.29 Circuit used to show the benefits of a decoupling capacitor.
VDD
1 V
5k
5k
Current pulse used
to model a circuit
pulling current.
Resistance of the wires
Decoupling capacitor
Ideally VDD
Ideally ground